qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
To: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu hw/ppc_oldworld.c target-ppc/cpu.h target-...
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:18:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071124001819.GI9204@networkno.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195861001.24893.40.camel@rapid>

J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
> >  Showing more than 32 bits of register 
> > is completely bogus.
> 
> No. It's showing the full CPU state, which can be more than what the
> application (or the OS, when running virtualized on a real CPU) could
> see. The OS cannot see the whole CPU state, but Qemu must implement more
> than the OS can see and is then able to dump it. 64 bits GPR is just a
> specific case of a general behavior.
> 
> >  Any differences between a 32-bit host and a 64-bit host 
> > are a qemu bug. If you display 64 bits, then those 64 bits had better be the 
> > same when run on 32-bit hosts.
> 
> Why ? The idea is that it costs too much to keep the whole state when
> running on a 32 bits host, then we act as a restricted embedded
> implementation. When the host CPU allows it without any extra cost, we
> act as the specification defines we should. This is a choice. Once
> again, this choice can be discussed and may be changed if I get
> convinced it would be better not to act this way. But this behavior is
> sure not bugged, it exactly follows (or may say should exactly if well
> implemented) the PowerPC specification.

Degrading the emulation capabilities in dependence of the host capabilities
with disregard of the user's requests sounds like a tremendously bad idea
to me. So

- If the high bits state is discoverable from guest software then it
  should always be emulated, independent of the host.
- If the high bits state is software transparent, then it should never
  be emulated. Even on a 64-bit host it will reduce performance as it
  moves more state through the caches. Moreover, the emulation will stay
  architecturally correct WRT to software execution, which is, I believe,
  the part of the spec which actually counts for QEMU.


Thiemo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-24  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-23 17:33 [Qemu-devel] qemu hw/ppc_oldworld.c target-ppc/cpu.h target- Paul Brook
2007-11-23 17:51 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-11-23 18:22   ` Paul Brook
2007-11-23 18:42     ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-11-23 18:46       ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-11-23 19:10       ` Paul Brook
2007-11-23 19:19         ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-11-23 20:08         ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-11-23 21:36           ` Paul Brook
2007-11-23 22:05             ` J. Mayer
2007-11-23 22:23               ` Paul Brook
2007-11-23 23:36                 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-11-24 19:39                   ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-11-23 23:36                 ` J. Mayer
2007-11-24  0:18                   ` Thiemo Seufer [this message]
2007-11-24  0:52                   ` Paul Brook
2007-11-24  1:02                     ` Julian Seward
2007-11-24  1:32                     ` J. Mayer
2007-11-24  1:55                       ` J. Mayer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-23 22:16 Jocelyn Mayer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071124001819.GI9204@networkno.de \
    --to=ths@networkno.de \
    --cc=l_indien@magic.fr \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).