From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxNbC-0002bB-CI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:09:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IxNbB-0002ae-IO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:09:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxNbB-0002aU-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:09:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IxNbB-0004lr-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:09:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:09:05 +0000 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] another patch against head Message-ID: <20071128140905.GD4083@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20071128133910.GC4083@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Hotmail , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Johannes Schindelin, le Wed 28 Nov 2007 14:01:21 +0000, a écrit : > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin, le Wed 28 Nov 2007 12:49:34 +0000, a ?crit : > > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Hotmail wrote: > > > > > > > The following is another patch against the head that lets me build it on > > > > Windows, as well as makes the adlib.c file debuggable. > > > > > > > > Index: Makefile > > > > =================================================================== > > > > RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/Makefile,v > > > > retrieving revision 1.136 > > > > diff -r1.136 Makefile > > > > 17a18,20 > > > > > ifdef CONFIG_WIN32 > > > > > LIBS= -lmingw32 -mno-cygwin > > > > > else > > > > 18a22 > > > > > endif > > > > > > So you build it in Cygwin, not "on Windows". > > > > Not exactly. -mno-cygwin means that he used the cygwin-provided gcc, but > > provide a non-cygwin binary that can be shipped without extra dlls. > > And how exactly does that differ from what I said? It is building in > Cygwin. With the MinGW headers. That makes a big difference. Compiling in cygwin with -mno-cygwin is almost the same as compiling with MinGW tools (the difference mostly lies in Makefile and shell script subtleties) Samuel