From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IyGjW-0005TN-EF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:01:26 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IyGjU-0005Ps-MC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:01:25 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyGjU-0005PQ-Fl
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:01:24 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1IyGjU-00018Z-9M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:01:24 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Host ARM
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:01:17 +0000
References: <bff090b20711301655j1cd3bdbbp47eeebf4e3b34339@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bff090b20711301655j1cd3bdbbp47eeebf4e3b34339@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200712010101.18249.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Valery Surkov <survb05@gmail.com>

> What is current situation with Host ARM  and  guest X86?

Should work with a bit of hacking.
Of course it's not likely to be particularly fast, even on relatively high-end 
xscale hardware.

Paul