From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0D1X-0007Uh-H6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:28:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0D1U-0007Tp-VB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:28:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0D1U-0007TO-4c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:28:00 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0D1T-00042F-Ng for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 04:27:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:27:52 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device Message-ID: <20071206092752.GA21885@shareable.org> References: <4755CC8C.6000001@us.ibm.com> <4755E774.8090408@qumranet.com> <4756DD7A.8070008@us.ibm.com> <200712051744.03916.paul@codesourcery.com> <47570817.9090908@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47570817.9090908@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Rusty Russell , Paul Brook Anthony Liguori wrote: > virtio makes things a bit trickier though. There's a shared ring queue > between the host and guest. Does this work when the host and guest are different architectures, or different word sizes (x86/x86_64)? -- Jamie