From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2o7K-0003YQ-GQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:46 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2o7J-0003X4-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2o7J-0003Wp-5O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:45 -0500 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J2o7J-0003AJ-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:45 -0500 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3242998022 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:28:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF71998021 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J2o7G-0006be-6a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:28:42 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm eabi TLS Message-ID: <20071213132842.GA25184@caradoc.them.org> References: <1197420297.2947.94.camel@phantasm.home.enterpriseandprosperity.com> <476068AA.80001@bellard.org> <200712130121.04204.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712130121.04204.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:21:03AM +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state. On many machines > (including ARMv6 CPUs) it's an actual CPU register. I'm fairly sure the same > is true for recent MIPS revisions. That's correct, though I don't know if there is silicon to match yet. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery