From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA7EV-0002G5-4T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:18:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JA7ET-0002Da-Mr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:18:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JA7ET-0002DT-Gi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:18:21 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JA7ET-00078q-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:18:21 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu cpu-all.h exec.c Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:18:04 +0000 References: <477AB3D4.5080106@bellard.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801021718.06316.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Blue Swirl > Also the opaque parameter may need to be different for each function, > it just didn't matter for the unassigned memory case. Do you really have systems where independent devices need to respond to different sized accesses to the same address? Paul