From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXcv-0005JT-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:29:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXcq-0005H6-Oo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:29:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXcq-0005Gq-DS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:29:16 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAXcq-0003xU-3n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:29:16 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] performance monitor Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:29:06 +0000 References: <200801032136.27558.clemens.kol@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <200801032136.27558.clemens.kol@gmx.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801032129.09756.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Clemens Kolbitsch > ... Ok, to cut a long question short: Is there any hardware support im qemu > for doing monitoring (that goes deeper than using "time") and has anyone > ever tested something that could work? Probably your application wants the performance counters. Qemu doesn't emulate those. Besides which, qemu is not cycle accurate. Any performance measurements your make are pretty much meaningless, and bear absolutely no relationship to real hardware. Paul