From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JAYP4-0003Tx-QI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:19:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JAYP2-0003Ol-KZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:19:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAYP2-0003OI-FN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:19:04 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1JAYP2-0007jf-1I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:19:04 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] performance monitor
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:18:58 +0000
References: <200801032136.27558.clemens.kol@gmx.at>
	<200801032207.08448.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<200801032311.24715.clemens.kol@gmx.at>
In-Reply-To: <200801032311.24715.clemens.kol@gmx.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801032218.59363.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Clemens Kolbitsch <clemens.kol@gmx.at>

> Well, the measuring I had in mind partly concentrats on TLB misses, page
> faults, etc. (in addition to the cycle measuring). guess i'll have to
> implement something for myself in qemu :-/

Be aware that the TLB qemu uses behaves very differently to a real CPU TLB. If 
you want to get TLB miss statistics you'll need to model a "real" TLB for 
that separately.

Page faults should be straightforward, but any half-decent guest OS would be 
able to tell you those anyway.

Paul