From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmtg-0006ZB-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmtf-0006Wl-5P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:36:12 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEmte-0006Wf-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:36:10 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEmte-0000Sy-HY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:36:10 -0500 Received: from jamie by mail2.shareable.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JElc8-0003Ot-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:14:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:14:00 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] OSX x86_32 host support Message-ID: <20080115131359.GC11941@shareable.org> References: <7BE93927-F16C-4CA5-86DC-F17955A0A67C@kberg.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Alexander Graf wrote: > I believe the 5% performance hit > that goes with them is no real problem, as most people should be using > x86_64 nowadays anyway. *Boggle*! x86_64 is only a few years old, and cheap low-power x86_64 laptops are relatively recent. -- Jamie