From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JF7wv-0005dM-5n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:04:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JF7wt-0005bd-7e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:04:56 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JF7wt-0005bV-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:04:55 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JF7ws-0006WC-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:04:54 -0500 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr (dhcp-16-192.uk.xensource.com [172.31.16.192]) by smtp01.ad.xensource.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0GD49GL027256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:04:11 -0800 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JF7w8-0003Bq-Fv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:04:08 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:04:08 +0000 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU static build Message-ID: <20080116130408.GK4261@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <7f7951300801160220i6852c881of112cfd259d67476@mail.gmail.com> <7f7951300801160348h4d07d8et2984e6940ebef96c@mail.gmail.com> <478DF896.3040208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <7f7951300801160459m734eff80n32d902a0e1608872@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7f7951300801160459m734eff80n32d902a0e1608872@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Salil Bijur, le Wed 16 Jan 2008 18:29:31 +0530, a écrit : > But there are further linker errors with respect to libasound (for > ALSA) and libSDL. This can be solved by adding -ldl, -lartsc, etc. for > every dependency of these libs but would be very tedious, especially > for libSDL. Any better solution? That's a libSDL bug: sdl-config --static-libs should report all of them, but it looks like it doesn't. Samuel