From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIRKG-00049z-CR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:22:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIRKE-00045z-2d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:22:43 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIRKD-00045V-O9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:22:41 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIRKD-0006g7-7z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:22:41 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CPPFLAGS+= in Makefile.target Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:22:35 +0000 References: <18329.61367.473953.391435@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <200801251603.12341.paul@codesourcery.com> <18330.2699.202394.792999@mariner.uk.xensource.com> In-Reply-To: <18330.2699.202394.792999@mariner.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801251622.36572.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Ian Jackson > > Why don't you just put your custom flags in CFLAGS, not CPPFLAGS? > > The former is deliberately left for the user to override. > > Several (but not all AFAICT) of the target subdirectory Makefiles set > CFLAGS. Really? Which ones? Paul