From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLDtQ-000550-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:38:32 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLDtN-00051e-Pe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:38:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLDtN-00051E-HG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:38:29 -0500 Received: from kassel160.server4you.de ([62.75.246.160] helo=csgraf.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLDtN-0004je-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:38:29 -0500 Received: from Inbox (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by csgraf.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA98DAFD4 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:38:19 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 content-class: From: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Intel Mac OS X Host support Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:38:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <20080202083820.BA98DAFD4@csgraf.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Mike, Sorry for top posting, but I left my macbook at work, so I'm stuck with my= mobile that does not know how to do inline replies. As stated in the patchset, it brings osx en pair with Linux hosts. This mea= ns if Linux gcc4 support is broken, osx gcc4 support is broken as well. Nevertheless I believe this is the way to go, as it makes osx just 'yet ano= ther gcc4 only distribution'. i386 host: You are exactly where I am. To build the i386 target, deactivate the assemb= ler optimized softmmu (target-i386/op.c on the top). Maybe Fabrice can tell= us more about this, as he supposedly tried to fix this exact issue. x86_64 target support is broken. It is on Linux with the gcc4 patches too t= hough. Other targets may or may not work. As long as they are 32 bits, I think the= y do, but I did not test it.=20 x86_64 host: This one should work just fine. If you find any issues here, please tell me=