From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMC2S-00049V-Ux for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:51:53 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMC2O-0003xi-9w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:51:52 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMC2O-0003xT-5Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:51:48 -0500 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMC2O-0004TX-65 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:51:48 -0500 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080205005327.VBJH13372.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:53:27 +0000 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([82.21.96.230]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080205005517.MJZ26699.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@implementation.famille.thibault.fr> for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:55:17 +0000 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JMC2I-0002fE-Rz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:51:42 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:51:42 +0000 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x Message-ID: <20080205005142.GD4368@implementation> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Mmm, actually, shouldn't qemu use a more "private" network like a RFC1918 172.16.0.0/12 network? (see http://www.ucam.org/cam-grin/) Samuel