From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMLJ7-0005hS-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMLJ4-0005dF-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMLJ3-0005cn-OD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:38 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMLJ3-0006eG-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:45:37 -0500 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr (dhcp-16-192.uk.xensource.com [172.31.16.192]) by smtp01.ad.xensource.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m15AirC6010463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:44:55 -0800 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JMLIL-0001Dz-BN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:44:53 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:44:53 +0000 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Making qemu use 10.0.3.x not 10.0.2.x Message-ID: <20080205104453.GB4322@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <20080205005142.GD4368@implementation> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Andreas Schwab, le Tue 05 Feb 2008 11:32:30 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault writes: > > > Mmm, actually, shouldn't qemu use a more "private" network like a > > RFC1918 172.16.0.0/12 network? > > In which way is 172.16.0.0/12 more "private" than 10.0.0.0/8? Precisely thanks to the reservation page I mentioned. Samuel