From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRtYK-0005Eq-8E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRtYI-0005Db-5N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRtYI-0005DU-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:18 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRtYH-0008F4-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:38:22 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] bdrv_flush error handling Message-ID: <20080220163821.GB5520@shareable.org> References: <18364.19722.241175.337829@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <18364.23313.189546.386460@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <20080220163155.GA5520@shareable.org> <200802201817.08702.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802201817.08702.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: > > Is savevm-upon-disk-full a realistic prospect? > > Not particularly useful. If you're run out of disk space, chances are that > savevm will also fail. I'm imagining (a) that the savevm space is preallocated, or (b) is on a different disk. -- Jamie