From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JT13F-000625-41
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:32:53 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JT13D-0005yl-BT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:32:52 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT13D-0005yU-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:32:51 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1JT13C-00039T-I8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:32:50 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC, WIP] TCG for Qemu target Sparc32/64
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:32:43 +0000
References: <f43fc5580802211227u4e6e5ee6ofd4582c3a16bce46@mail.gmail.com>
	<47C064B5.4040809@bellard.org>
In-Reply-To: <47C064B5.4040809@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802232032.44673.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

> Another point is that you should define TCG globals for each SPARC GPR.
> It was not done for i386 because I feared performance regressions when
> accessing to 16 bit or 8 bit sub-registers. On SPARC you do not have
> this issue.

How would these be kept consistent with CPUState?

Paul