From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT4H7-0002Gx-Rm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JT4H6-0002GI-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JT4H5-0002GF-SH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:23 -0500 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JT4H5-00066L-C2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:59:23 -0500 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080224000152.VGPO19530.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:01:52 +0000 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.26.151]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080224000158.CBPA219.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:01:58 +0000 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JT4Gy-0001og-CR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:59:16 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:59:16 +0000 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC, WIP] TCG for Qemu target Sparc32/64 Message-ID: <20080223235916.GA6939@miranda.arrow> References: <47C064B5.4040809@bellard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47C064B5.4040809@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 07:23:49PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > But do not mix the target specific defines with target independent > defines (in tcg-op.h there is a specific section for target specific > defines). Might it be worth moving that section into a new file? -- Stuart Brady