From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU: fsync AIO writes on flush request
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:03:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328180324.GA22555@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328163116.GA18853@dmt>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:07:03PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Its necessary to guarantee that pending AIO writes have reached stable
> > > storage when the flush request returns.
> > >
> > > Also change fsync() to fdatasync(), since the modification time is not
> > > critical data.
> > > + if (aio_fsync(O_DSYNC, &acb->aiocb) < 0) {
> >
> > > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> > > - fsync(s->fd);
> > > + raw_aio_flush(bs);
> > > + fdatasync(s->fd);
> > > +
> > > + /* We rely on the fact that no other AIO will be submitted
> > > + * in parallel, but this should be fixed by per-device
> > > + * AIO queues when allowing multiple CPU's to process IO
> > > + * in QEMU.
> > > + */
> > > + qemu_aio_flush();
> >
> > I'm a bit confused by this. Why do you need aio_fsync(O_DSYNC) _and_
> > synchronous fdatasync() calls? Aren't they equivalent?
>
> fdatasync() will write and wait for completion of dirty file data
> present in memory.
>
> aio_write() only queues data for submission:
>
> The "asynchronous" means that this call returns as soon as the request
> has been enqueued; the write may or may not have completed when the
> call returns. One tests for completion using aio_error(3).
>
> So fdatasync() is not enough because data written via AIO may not
> have been reflected as "dirty file data" through write() by the time
> raw_flush() is called.
Sure. But why isn't the aio_fsync(O_DSYNC) enough by itself?
It seems to me you should have something like this:
/* Flush pending aio_writes until they are dirty data,
and wait before the aio_fsync. */
qemu_aio_flush();
/* Call aio_fsync(O_DSYNC). */
raw_aio_flush(bs);
/* Wait for the aio_fsync to complete. */
qemu_aio_flush();
What am I missing?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 15:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU: fsync AIO writes on flush request Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-28 16:31 ` [kvm-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 16:40 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 16:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 17:00 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 18:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-29 1:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 2:02 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-29 2:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 2:43 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 18:03 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2008-03-28 18:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-29 1:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 6:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 17:25 ` Ian Jackson
2008-03-28 19:11 ` [kvm-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328180324.GA22555@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).