From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU: fsync AIO writes on flush request
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:36:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080328183628.GB19547@dmt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328180324.GA22555@shareable.org>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:03:25PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:07:03PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > Its necessary to guarantee that pending AIO writes have reached stable
> > > > storage when the flush request returns.
> > > >
> > > > Also change fsync() to fdatasync(), since the modification time is not
> > > > critical data.
> > > > + if (aio_fsync(O_DSYNC, &acb->aiocb) < 0) {
> > >
> > > > BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> > > > - fsync(s->fd);
> > > > + raw_aio_flush(bs);
> > > > + fdatasync(s->fd);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* We rely on the fact that no other AIO will be submitted
> > > > + * in parallel, but this should be fixed by per-device
> > > > + * AIO queues when allowing multiple CPU's to process IO
> > > > + * in QEMU.
> > > > + */
> > > > + qemu_aio_flush();
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused by this. Why do you need aio_fsync(O_DSYNC) _and_
> > > synchronous fdatasync() calls? Aren't they equivalent?
> >
> > fdatasync() will write and wait for completion of dirty file data
> > present in memory.
> >
> > aio_write() only queues data for submission:
> >
> > The "asynchronous" means that this call returns as soon as the request
> > has been enqueued; the write may or may not have completed when the
> > call returns. One tests for completion using aio_error(3).
> >
>
> > So fdatasync() is not enough because data written via AIO may not
> > have been reflected as "dirty file data" through write() by the time
> > raw_flush() is called.
>
> Sure. But why isn't the aio_fsync(O_DSYNC) enough by itself?
It is enough, fdatasync() becomes redundant.
> It seems to me you should have something like this:
>
> /* Flush pending aio_writes until they are dirty data,
> and wait before the aio_fsync. */
> qemu_aio_flush();
>
> /* Call aio_fsync(O_DSYNC). */
> raw_aio_flush(bs);
>
> /* Wait for the aio_fsync to complete. */
> qemu_aio_flush();
>
> What am I missing?
I don't think the first qemu_aio_flush() is necessary because the fsync
request will be enqueued after pending ones:
aio_fsync() function does a sync on all outstanding asynchronous
I/O operations associated with aiocbp->aio_fildes.
More precisely, if op is O_SYNC, then all currently queued I/O opera-
tions shall be completed as if by a call of fsync(2), and if op is
O_DSYNC, this call is the asynchronous analog of fdatasync(2). Note
that this is a request only — this call does not wait for I/O comple-
tion.
glibc sets the priority for fsync as 0, which is the same priority AIO
reads and writes are submitted by QEMU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 15:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU: fsync AIO writes on flush request Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 15:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-28 16:31 ` [kvm-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 16:40 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 16:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 17:00 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 18:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-29 1:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 2:02 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-29 2:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 2:43 ` Paul Brook
2008-03-28 18:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-28 18:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2008-03-29 1:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-03-29 6:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2008-03-28 17:25 ` Ian Jackson
2008-03-28 19:11 ` [kvm-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080328183628.GB19547@dmt \
--to=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).