From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JnyfD-0006Nl-V3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jnyf9-0006Ks-5H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jnyf8-0006Km-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:39 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jnyf1-0007u8-EC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:38 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Linux SIGIO handling changes Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:13:37 +0100 References: <12086832292508-git-send-email-mail@flac.kalibalik.dk> <480C98B3.7050905@qumranet.com> <480CB61D.8050507@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <480CB61D.8050507@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804211713.38338.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > posix-aio is a pretty unfortunate interface as it doesn't provide a > mechanism to do asynchronous fdatasync() Isn't that what aio_fsync(O_DSYNC) does? Paul