From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JqTxJ-00076J-RI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:03:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JqTxH-00075z-4w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:03:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55874 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JqTxH-00075w-1u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:03:43 -0400 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JqTxG-0006GA-EJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:03:42 -0400 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080428140707.XTWN17818.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:07:07 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.26.151]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080428140343.MBMC29112.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:03:43 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JqTx9-0000W4-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:03:35 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:03:35 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: VGA 2bit mode Message-ID: <20080428140335.GA1967@miranda.arrow> References: <20080425180406.GG4279@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080428103006.GD4537@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080428103006.GD4537@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:30:06AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Answering to myself: > > > Does VGA 2bit mode voluntarily waste memory? > > Looks like it does, yes. Of course, if the comment explaining this were not missing, you would not need to ask the question. :-) -- Stuart Brady