From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Js7po-0000cc-7J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Js7pm-0000b2-Rp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33936 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Js7pm-0000ag-I0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:46 -0400
Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>) id 1Js7pm-00051O-CQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:46 -0400
Received: from erwin.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.80]
	helo=chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de)
	by os.inf.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
	id 1Js7pj-0002td-AL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 04:50:43 +0200
Received: from kauer by chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kauer@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>) id 1JrkFM-0002cl-7q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 03:39:36 +0200
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 03:39:36 +0200
From: Bernhard Kauer <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Crash due to invalid env->current_tb
Message-ID: <20080502013936.GC2715@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
References: <20080429115614.GA15524@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<f43fc5580804291009s4dea4233y472c9823f42d021c@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080429184011.GK17356@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<C654F6F0-37A1-4E18-B067-7B8EBC724401@suse.de>
	<20080430151132.GB6712@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<1209569284.4312.35.camel@frecb07144>
	<20080430203636.GC8164@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080430203636.GC8164@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:36:36PM +0200, Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> > Why don't you add ebp and ebx in the clobbered registers list (like
> > "esi", "edi", "ecx", "edx") ?
> 
> For ebp it's more safe to use push as it depends whether the binary is
> compiled with frame-pointer or without. When without you can put it into
> the clobber list, when with you should not, we had some bad experience
> with this (also see gcc bugzilla #11807).

Well the gcc bug is, that clobbering "ebp" is silently ignored if compiled
without frame-pointer.


	Bernhard Kauer