From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JtBZt-0004fV-9L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 21:02:45 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JtBZr-0004f9-PT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 21:02:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55740 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtBZr-0004f6-IO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 21:02:43 -0400
Received: from hobi.com ([130.94.185.247])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rickv@hobi.com>) id 1JtBZr-0001aC-DI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 May 2008 21:02:43 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO ricklap) ([68.255.102.73])
	(envelope-sender <rickv@hobi.com>)
	by 130.94.185.247 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; 6 May 2008 01:02:41 -0000
From: Rick Vernam <rickv@hobi.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] reproducable triple-faults
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 20:02:40 -0500
References: <200805051956.30458.rickv@hobi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200805051956.30458.rickv@hobi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200805052002.41055.rickv@hobi.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Monday 05 May 2008 07:56:30 pm Rick Vernam wrote:
[snip]
> (conservative govener, typically at 800mhz), a windows xp virtual machine
> will triple fault seemingly invariably.
it triple faults during boot.  forgot that detail...
I don't know much about exactly how windows boots, but the fault is always 
just before the fancy windows xp boot screen.