From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZJ4-0005tF-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZJ3-0005su-EV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34788 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZJ3-0005sY-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:13 -0400 Received: from miranda.se.axis.com ([193.13.178.8]:52495) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JvZJ2-0004pI-4a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:12 -0400 Received: from axis.com (edgar.se.axis.com [10.93.151.1]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id m4CElAPf018732 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 16:47:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:47:09 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debugging vmlinux with qemu and gdb. Unable to step, next, print or to get any information.. Message-ID: <20080512144709.GF21455@edgar.se.axis.com> References: <824D057211107844BA95DB341B4BF12E01139BF2@hanvsmail04.eu.thmulti.com> <48283D34.8080508@windriver.com> <20080512140243.GE21455@edgar.se.axis.com> <200805121533.32363.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805121533.32363.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Edgar E. Iglesias" On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 03:33:31PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > Btw, while your at it you might want to consider another comment. When > > trying the sstep I felt it was easy to get confused with the negated > > bitmasks. Maybe we should invert them? > > > > The default bitmask would change to 1. And sstepbits would be > > "ENABLE=1,IRQ=2,TIMERS=4". Does that make sense? > > Or just have the command use symbolic names rather than numeric values. Even better :) Jason, I was refering to the user exposed interface. Internally you can handle it the way you want. -- Edgar E. Iglesias Axis Communications AB