From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1kxD-0006Tf-Nk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 12:26:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1kxB-0006TP-Cc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 12:26:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41527 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1kxB-0006TK-3S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 12:26:13 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:32822) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1kxA-0005vj-SI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 12:26:13 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KQEMU code organization Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:26:04 +0100 References: <483C3D55.2000508@siemens.com> <483EA1AD.1010901@bellard.org> <20080529161322.GB21610@shareable.org> In-Reply-To: <20080529161322.GB21610@shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ansi_x3.4-1968" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805291726.05398.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > I.e. kvm has two sub-modules for Intel VT and AMD SVM extensions (I > think that's their names). It would be great if it hard a third KQEMU > sub-module (which would of course be the most complicated ;-) I believe this is also a prerequisite for getting kqemu merged into maintream kernels, which IMHO is the only sane goal to have. Out of tree kernel modules simply aren't worth the effort. Paul