From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] Debugger enhancements
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:06:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806010106.14958.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48419C01.2040607@bellard.org>
> I don't think it is a good idea to say that breakpoints/watchpoints
> apply to all processors. Such behavior should be handled at a higher level.
>
> It would also be interesting if the watchpoint/breakpoint implementation
> could be used to implement CPU watchpoints and breakpoints (I am
> thinking about the x86 DRx registers here).
Watchpoints and breakpoints are architecture independent debugger features.
The gdb break/watchpoints should be independent of any user visible debug
hardware.
I agree it probably makes sense for both to share an implementation though.
> If this is the wanted behavior then the same system as the Self
> Modifying Code on x86 should be used. Basically it consists in doing as
> a MMU fault and single stepping one instruction after. Unfortunately I
> fear the implementation will be complicated.
FWIW I'm planning on reviving the instruction counting patches and making some
modifications to the mmio TLB handling, which should provide infrastructure
for doing this in a better way.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-01 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-31 12:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Debugger enhancements Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 13:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] Add read watchpoint support Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 13:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] Watchpoint length and type awareness Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 13:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Report exact PC on watchpoint hit Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 14:11 ` Paul Brook
2008-05-31 14:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 15:17 ` Paul Brook
2008-05-31 13:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] Enhance SMP guest debugging Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 13:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] Refactor breakpoint API and gdbstub integration Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Debugger enhancements Fabrice Bellard
2008-05-31 17:05 ` Paul Brook
2008-05-31 17:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 18:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabrice Bellard
2008-06-01 13:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-01 12:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jamie Lokier
2008-06-01 13:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 17:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-05-31 18:42 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-06-01 0:06 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-06-01 13:53 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806010106.14958.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).