From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: An organizational suggestion
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:48:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080603124813.GK1227@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18501.15035.278670.542982@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:36:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Kiszka writes ("[Qemu-devel] Re: An organizational suggestion"):
> > What is more critical, IMHO, is that there are the resources
> > (maintainer time) to review and give concrete feedback on patches as
> > long as they are "fresh". Otherwise, a tracker will just shift the
> > work around.
>
> Quite. I think that the key problem we have at the moment is lack of
> maintainer time, not lack of appropriate tools.
>
> > Another remark: If potential new maintainers should be affiliated with
> > any of the, to some degree, competing QEMU "accelerators" Xen and KVM, I
> > would be happy to see a public agreement beforehand on the general
> > architectural roadmap to cover those two requirement domains (+ the one
> > of KQEMU) in the future QEMU design. It would be bad for this project if
> > one side overrules the other via the (non-technical) preference of a
> > maintainer. Really, that's nothing against Ian personally or against
> > Xen/Citrix, the same would apply to KVM/Qumranet!
>
> I replied to this in my other message, but once again: I think
> actually that the Xen people and the KVM people will get on fine.
Alot of them are even the same people :-) Getting Xen and KVM more closely
following QEMU would be a huge benefit to everyone involved in all three
projects.
It is in no one's interests to maintain forked code long term - I feel the
pain having to deal with security updates for Fedora - the last one needed
me to modify & release 9 different RPMs - 3 KVM, 3 QEMU and 3 Xen RPMs,
all with subtlely different versions of the code.
Daniel.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 5:42 [Qemu-devel] An organizational suggestion Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN)
2008-06-03 9:27 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 10:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 10:19 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 11:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 12:32 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 13:01 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-03 14:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 13:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 14:02 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 14:35 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-03 14:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 14:55 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-03 15:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 14:54 ` Laurent Vivier
2008-06-03 15:04 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 15:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 15:27 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 19:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 15:24 ` Laurent Vivier
2008-06-03 20:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 20:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 10:23 ` Andreas Färber
2008-06-03 11:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-03 12:36 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 12:48 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080603124813.GK1227@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).