From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: An organizational suggestion
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:26:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080603142617.GA32331@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <484540A0.6040907@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I think we don't need this agreement-in-advance if the people who
> finally decide about commits are neutral due to their affiliation or
> have proven to be neutral despite of it, both politically as well as
> technically - someone being deeply involved in one of both approaches
> /may/ look biased at things, naturally.
As a user (not really a contributor), it looks like vague neutrality
is what we have now. E.g. the command-line and (proposed) config file
are really messy, it looks like people try to do 'just technical'
patches to those because they might be accepted, rather than a
coherent design. That's just an example, but a visible one.
But I'm probably not seeing a lot that goes on off-list.
I think the project would benefit from some more vision for it's next
step, so that _potential_ contributors (like me) have an idea what
it's worth looking it, and how best to ensure contributions are useful.
Right now, there are several bugs, improvements (if you agree :-) and
documentation I'm curious to look at, but I'm not going to waste my
time if I think it won't be used. Writing notes on a disorganised
wiki does not count as worth my time.
I think encouraging more subsystem maintainers would be good. I have
a problem with USB tablet at the moment - Windows Server 2003's driver
doesn't work with it - and no idea who to send to. Bugs like that
reported to the list often don't get a response, but I'm sure someone
cares. Assuming so, it suggests they might like to be a contact -
even if it's as specific as "USB tablet: <person>" so they don't have
to deal with much, just occasional rare feedback.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 5:42 [Qemu-devel] An organizational suggestion Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN)
2008-06-03 9:27 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 10:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 10:19 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 11:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 12:32 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 13:01 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-03 14:26 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2008-06-03 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 13:45 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 14:02 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 14:35 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-03 14:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 14:55 ` Paul Brook
2008-06-03 15:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 14:54 ` Laurent Vivier
2008-06-03 15:04 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 15:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 15:27 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 19:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-03 15:24 ` Laurent Vivier
2008-06-03 20:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 20:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 10:23 ` Andreas Färber
2008-06-03 11:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-06-03 12:36 ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-03 12:48 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080603142617.GA32331@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).