From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3XhZ-0002YK-8Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:41:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3XhX-0002Uj-Fn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:41:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60271 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3XhX-0002UQ-7M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:41:27 -0400 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:34965) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3XhX-0008GK-Hk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:41:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:41:24 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] An organizational suggestion Message-ID: <20080603144124.GD32331@shareable.org> References: <193307.64140.qm@web57014.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <18501.20210.209142.106241@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <200806031535.40996.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200806031535.40996.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Ian Jackson Paul Brook wrote: > I'd just like to point out that committing patches is easy. The hard > (and time consuming) bit is identifying, rejecting, fixing and/or > making constructive comments on all the bogus patches. The are lots > of patches that fall into this latter category, e.g. patches that > have clearly only ever been tested on x86 targets. It doesn't take > any special privileges to do this patch review. So true, very good point. I don't see a lot of patches posted to this list though. It seems rather fewer than the number of commits. Are these patches being sent somewhere else instead? Where should I send patches? Cheers, -- Jamie