qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+tools@mega-nerd.com>,
	"Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN)" <x_at_y_or_z@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Suggestion for testing framework
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:02:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806032302.09778.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080604075042.aff7c055.mle+tools@mega-nerd.com>

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > It seems that there is agreement that some sort of automated
> > testing is "a good thing" ;-).
>
> I am a huge fan of testing and think that qemu developers and users
> would both benefit from more automated testing.

IMHO Automated testing by itself is pretty much worthless.
The value comes from having someone look at the results, and actively fix 
problems as they are discovered. Once you've allocated resources to do this 
bugfixing setting up the testing is fairly trivial.

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-03 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-03 20:59 [Qemu-devel] Suggestion for testing framework Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN)
2008-06-03 21:50 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-06-03 21:53   ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 22:02   ` Paul Brook [this message]
2008-06-03 22:05     ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-03 22:17       ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-03 22:25       ` Paul Brook
2008-06-03 22:35         ` Thiemo Seufer
2008-06-04  6:41           ` Laurent Desnogues
2008-06-04  7:49             ` Laurent Desnogues
2008-06-04  9:44             ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2008-06-04 10:28         ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-04 12:32           ` Glauber Costa
2008-06-04 12:36             ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-05 10:13         ` Ian Jackson
2008-06-05 12:42           ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-04 10:36 ` Fabrice Bellard
2008-06-15 18:52 ` [Qemu-devel][Patch] " Stefan Weil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200806032302.09778.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=mle+tools@mega-nerd.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=x_at_y_or_z@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).