From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBYmZ-0001RY-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:27:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBYmY-0001RJ-5v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:27:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54263 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBYmX-0001RG-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:27:45 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:56019) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KBYmX-0000o1-E4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:27:45 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong destination register for smuad, smusd, smlad, smlsd Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:27:31 +0100 References: <761ea48b0806230240h31745caaj24e9c6f9ce80eea2@mail.gmail.com> <200806251758.58313.paul@codesourcery.com> <761ea48b0806251015t4088f674hcacbc256b7a6dc0f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0806251015t4088f674hcacbc256b7a6dc0f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806251827.37618.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Laurent Desnogues > Anyway, are you interested in a patch that corrects enough of > v6 instructions that FFmpeg for ARMv6 works? Would FFmpeg > be considered as a good enough test? I'm generally more interested in the description/explanation of the patches themselves. Saying "FOO works" is nice, but not as nice as convincing me that you understand both the code you're changing, the arm architecture, and that the two agree :-) Paul