From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KD3pe-0003Ej-Hr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:49:10 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KD3pd-0003EX-Ug
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:49:10 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56080 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KD3pd-0003EU-PG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:49:09 -0400
Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:20308)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@qumranet.com>) id 1KD3pd-0000IZ-LI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:49:09 -0400
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:49:07 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Change qemu_set_irq() to return
	status information.
Message-ID: <20080629204907.GB17476@minantech.com>
References: <20080629140120.5626.1590.stgit@gleb-debian.qumranet.com.qumranet.com>
	<200806291911.02093.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20080629194412.GA17476@minantech.com>
	<200806292134.08436.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200806292134.08436.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:34:08PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > The model takes into account that not all interrupt controller are
> > capable to detect missed interrupt (it is possible that there is no
> > interrupt controller at all). In this case irq function should
> > return one and everything will fall back to how it works now.
> 
> On a related note the correct way to fix this is "-icount auto".
> You should make sure that your hacks are not enabled when we have a realistic 
> virtual timebase.
> 
Can you educate me what "-icount auto" is? Quick grep in qemu tree shows
nothing.

--
			Gleb.