From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJHR-0001mZ-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJHQ-0001lc-QO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59487 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJHQ-0001lM-KD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:52 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([212.179.150.194]:51330) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDJHQ-0000MH-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:18:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:18:50 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov Message-ID: <20080630131850.GF31298@minantech.com> References: <20080629140120.5626.1590.stgit@gleb-debian.qumranet.com.qumranet.com> <200806291911.02093.paul@codesourcery.com> <20080629194412.GA17476@minantech.com> <200806292134.08436.paul@codesourcery.com> <4867F786.7070002@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4867F786.7070002@web.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Change qemu_set_irq() to return status information. Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:58:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > However, I started to wonder if this model is already enough to handle > the case where QEMU itself looses ticks. At least the PIT should > currently not be able to deal with such issues, so you also won't see > coalesce counters increase. Or am I missing something? > You don't miss anything. If QEMU losses ticks the time will still drift with this patches too. -- Gleb.