From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGxSB-0006Ns-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:49:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGxSB-0006Mv-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:49:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42638 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGxSA-0006Mh-Oh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:49:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:5986 helo=SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGxSA-00005c-FL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:49:02 -0400 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KGxSB-0003gQ-3D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:49:03 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:49:03 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug in SDL key event processing Message-ID: <20080710144903.GI4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <48754DF2.2010704@dbservice.com> <20080709235516.GM4889@implementation> <48755320.5090707@dbservice.com> <48757FB8.8010400@codemonkey.ws> <4875C0B6.2060302@dbservice.com> <4876101A.1080800@codemonkey.ws> <487611FC.5070500@dbservice.com> <487616BB.8020402@dbservice.com> <20080710141027.GH4536@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48761A9C.80207@dbservice.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <48761A9C.80207@dbservice.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Tomas Carnecky, le Thu 10 Jul 2008 16:20:12 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Tomas Carnecky, le Thu 10 Jul 2008 16:03:39 +0200, a écrit : > >>Am I the only one who uses the evdev driver and runs QEMU? I can't > >>believe that. > > > >evdev has been experimental for quite a long time. I don't know e.g. a > >distribution that uses it by default. I hence wouldn't be surprised. > > It's used by default if the xserver runs on Linux and uses > auto-configuration (hald). That feature has been added in xorg 7.2 or > so. Oh? Not on the debian machines I've recently installed at least. > Evdev is actually the preferred way to talk to keyboards and such > under Linux. It has been stable for a couple years now (since 2.6?), Err, that's not what my X.org contacts say about evdev :) I'm not talking about the implementation in the linux kernel, but the mess arout keyboard configuration. Samuel