From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KH4PF-00062N-Gb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:14:29 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KH4PE-000612-1A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:14:29 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50363 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KH4PD-00060s-TS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:14:27 -0400
Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:13701)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@labri.fr>) id 1KH4PD-0001aT-Jr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:14:27 -0400
Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
	by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20080710221914.UJHK28496.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:19:14 +0100
Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([82.21.96.230])
	by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20080710222457.YAAB8797.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@implementation.famille.thibault.fr>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:24:57 +0100
Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim
	4.69) (envelope-from <samuel.thibault@labri.fr>) id 1KH4PD-0003F7-3p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:14:27 +0200
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:14:27 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug in SDL key event processing
Message-ID: <20080710221427.GF4579@implementation>
References: <48757FB8.8010400@codemonkey.ws> <4875C0B6.2060302@dbservice.com>
	<4876101A.1080800@codemonkey.ws> <487611FC.5070500@dbservice.com>
	<487616BB.8020402@dbservice.com> <48761F31.4090909@codemonkey.ws>
	<48762C59.9010204@dbservice.com> <48766211.2090304@codemonkey.ws>
	<20080710215524.GB4579@implementation>
	<4876872B.6080704@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4876872B.6080704@codemonkey.ws>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori, le Thu 10 Jul 2008 17:03:23 -0500, a écrit :
> Which is what we're trying to do.  The issue is that the 
> keysyms=>positional keycode mapping is 1->many.  That's what the -k 
> mappings are selecting.

Yep.

In the X11 case, however, we could use XKB extensions to get it from the
server, just like xkbprint does.  Maybe windows has a way to know which
keyboard layout is currently in use, and use the qemu keymap according
to that.

Samuel