From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH] x86: Optional segment type and limit checks - v2
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714110507.GD29536@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487B2BC8.9050804@siemens.com>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:34:48PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> This is the second version of my segment type and register check. It
> reduces the impact on the translator code significantly, and it also
> fixes a bug of the "size" helper variant in the previous version.
>
> The idea of this patch is to generate calls to a check helper only in
> case the user requested this support via "-seg-checks". This feature
> remains off by default as most x86 OSes do not care about protection via
> segmentation anymore (and it was even removed from 64-bit modes by the
> CPU vendors).
Two current users of protection via segmentation I know of
- 32-bit linux with the ExecShield capability will still use segmentation
to split the address space into executable vs non-executable regions, if
the CPU doesn't have NX bit support.
- 32-bit Xen uses segmentation for protecting the hypervisor.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-09 12:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH] x86: Optional segment type and limit checks Jan Kiszka
2008-07-14 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH] x86: Optional segment type and limit checks - v2 Jan Kiszka
2008-07-14 10:55 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-14 11:11 ` Paul Brook
2008-07-14 14:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-14 17:50 ` Kevin O'Connor
2008-07-14 18:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-15 15:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2008-07-15 16:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-16 1:20 ` Kevin O'Connor
2008-07-16 2:43 ` Kevin O'Connor
2008-07-14 11:05 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2008-07-15 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080714110507.GD29536@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).