From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMQql-00057E-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:13:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMQqj-000572-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:13:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41777 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMQqj-00056z-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:13:01 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:55533) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMQqi-00038d-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:13:00 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] integrate qemu-test into kvm-userspace Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:12:34 +0100 References: <1217004805-13955-1-git-send-email-ryanh@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1217004805-13955-1-git-send-email-ryanh@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807251812.34838.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Anthony Liguori , Ryan Harper , kvm@vger.kernel.org > Ultimately, I'd like to push this into qemu since nothing we're doing > here is arch or kvm specific. What advantage does inclusion with qemu give? AFAICS You're going to have to download gigabytes of images anyway, so wouldn't it make more sense to include the test script with those? Paul