From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNc54-0006Gb-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:24:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNc52-0006FX-Ju for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:24:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNc52-0006FU-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:24:40 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:12540) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNc4r-0005W0-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:24:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:24:28 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080728232428.GE11519@implementation> References: <18573.51733.193631.369340@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <488DDB2A.9000308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <488DDB2A.9000308@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Mon 28 Jul 2008 16:43:54 +0200, a écrit : > Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm generally in favour of pushing functionality out of the Xen branch > > of qemu into upstream. But going by Gerd Hoffman's description I > > don't think that's what his branch is. His code doesn't appear to be > > related to the Xen branch of qemu that we are using. > > I want to merge the *functionality*. IMHO that doesn't mean that it > must be the *code* used by Xen at the moment. Well, the patch comments weren't so clear about that. Samuel