From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNpUC-0000kt-4Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:32 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNpU9-0000k1-9e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49015 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNpU9-0000jy-61
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:29 -0400
Received: from csl.cornell.edu ([128.84.224.10]:4711 helo=vlsi.csl.cornell.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <vince@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>) id 1KNpU8-0001Pd-Ts
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:29 -0400
Received: from stanley.csl.cornell.edu (stanley.csl.cornell.edu
	[128.84.224.15])
	by vlsi.csl.cornell.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m6TDhN0M057307
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@csl.cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86 tcg problem
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0807290146i204b5605vdc505ebb57aace50@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080729094122.E28695@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
References: <20080728225136.C26546@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
	<761ea48b0807290146i204b5605vdc505ebb57aace50@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Laurent Desnogues wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Vince Weaver <vince@csl.cornell.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I've spent a day now trying to figure out why bzip2 compress/decompress
>> doesn't work when using sparc32plus-linux-user on x86.
>>
>> I've tracked the problem to the Zero flag being improperly set (attached is
>> a small exe/src that reproduces the problem.. it reports "Greater"
>> on real hardware, "Less Than" on qemu current).
>
> It looks like it works with revision 4963:
>
> ./sparc32plus-linux-user/qemu-sparc32plus cmp_test
> Less Equal
>
> I guess it's malc commits 4961-2 that fixed it :-)

I made a slight mistake in that post, "Less Equal" is the wrong condition, 
not "Less Than".  It still doesn't work, even with 4963.  Real hardware 
returns this:

(valor is a Niagara system)

valor:~/research/sparc_qemu% ./cmp_test
Greater


Vince