From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOki-0003ia-7k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:47:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOkg-0003fy-9o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:47:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48632 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQOkg-0003fV-2Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:47:10 -0400 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:5982 helo=SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQOkf-0003ap-I4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:47:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:47:08 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080805154708.GW4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> References: <1217865045-10722-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <48973F8E.8080109@codemonkey.ws> <20080805104630.GM4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <489835A3.6030804@redhat.com> <20080805112935.GO4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <48985336.2020709@redhat.com> <20080805150328.GT4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080805154140.GV4478@implementation.uk.xensource.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson Samuel Thibault, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 16:41:40 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 16:03:28 +0100, a écrit : > > Gerd Hoffmann, le Tue 05 Aug 2008 15:18:46 +0200, a écrit : > > > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Then it'd probably be good to push that upstream Xen. > > > > > > I'm cross-posting the patches to xen-devel for a reason. > > > > Well, cross-posting qemu patches to xen-devel is not the same as posting > > xen patches to xen-devel... > > Just to explain a bit more, now that I have read the patches a bit: And to be even more explicit, by "I have read the patches", I mean: I have applied them to upstream qemu, them vimdiffed the files there with the ones from Ian's tree (sometimes with different names), in order to have an idea of what the merge would be (i.e. the "xen patches" I mentioned above, which is what we care about from the point of view of xen-unstable). Samuel