From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRV2G-0003MO-GL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:41:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRV2D-0003KU-RR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:41:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37770 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRV2D-0003KR-NU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:41:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:41846) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRV2D-0003hp-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:41:49 -0400 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KRV24-0003S2-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:41:40 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:41:40 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Message-ID: <20080808164140.GF4645@implementation.uk.xensource.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] IDE SEEK_STAT flag Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hello, Is there a reason for not (almost) systematically setting the SEEK_STAT flag when READY_STAT is set and ERROR_STAT isn't, since we don't really have seeks? (except for *SLEEP* commands probably) At least Linux does wait for that flag for CDROMs, and with varying orders of commands, it may end up not being set, and Linux timing-out. Samuel