From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRtRF-0006Mi-Qh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:45:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRtRE-0006JT-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:45:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54108 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRtRD-0006JA-W9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:45:16 -0400 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:23358) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRtR8-0008Ga-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:45:15 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080809184506.KDLG21103.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 19:45:06 +0100 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([82.21.96.230]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080809184503.IHFE29597.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@implementation.famille.thibault.fr> for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 19:45:03 +0100 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KRtQc-0002C3-NG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:44:38 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 19:44:34 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] upgrading emulated UART to 16550A Message-ID: <20080809184434.GY4546@implementation> References: <489C7B19.5030905@eu.citrix.com> <489DE148.2000200@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <489DE148.2000200@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Anthony Liguori, le Sat 09 Aug 2008 13:26:16 -0500, a écrit : > Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >Same comments as before, but this time the cross-platform compatibility > >code should be correct. > >More opinions on this are welcome. > > > > I think the patch looks good. What targets/guests have you tested > with? Have you tested any non-x86 targets? Jason tested i386, x86_64 and mips BE/LE emulations (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-08/msg00236.html) Samuel