From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KS8gV-0005GQ-FS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:02:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KS8gS-0005DH-Bu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:02:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48538 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KS8gS-0005D3-2H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:02:00 -0400 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:54986) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KS8gD-00054E-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 07:01:59 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080810110144.VJYP777.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:01:44 +0100 Received: from implementation.famille.thibault.fr ([82.21.96.230]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20080810110141.MXJD29597.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@implementation.famille.thibault.fr> for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:01:41 +0100 Received: from samy by implementation.famille.thibault.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KS8g5-00028X-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:01:37 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:01:37 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add HPET emulation to qemu (v2) Message-ID: <20080810110137.GB4569@implementation> References: <20080807171705.GA15074@implementation.uk.xensource.com> <20080810011901.GC20183@shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080810011901.GC20183@shareable.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Jamie Lokier, le Sun 10 Aug 2008 02:19:01 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Beth Kon wrote some time ago: > > > But for an idle guest in both cases (with and without HPET), the > > > number of wakeups per second was relatively low (28). > > > > Oh, btw, did you try to reduce the qemu window? (or disconnect the VNC > > client if you are using VNC) 28 might be just because of the gui refresh > > rate. Reducing the window will lower the gui refresh rate to 2Hz. > > If the guest isn't drawing anything to video memory, and there are no > GUI events (e.g. redraw requests), why does the gui keep refreshing? It needs to poll the keyboard activity at least, IIRC SDL doesn't provide the X FD to poll. Samuel