From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7zR-0000tn-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:41:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7zR-0000t2-1P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:41:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59445 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KU7zQ-0000sx-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:41:48 -0400 Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:56665) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KU7zQ-0005W8-2g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:41:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:41:42 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] merge some xen bits into qemu Message-ID: <20080815224142.GF5198@implementation> References: <18592.28557.41406.258988@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <48A09BEC.2040504@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <48A09BEC.2040504@redhat.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gerd Hoffmann, le Mon 11 Aug 2008 22:07:08 +0200, a écrit : > Ian Jackson wrote: > > Gerd Hoffmann writes ("[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] merge some xen bits into qemu"): > >> Comments? > > > > Please do not apply these patches. They will make my life very > > difficult. > > Go to http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/qemu-xen/. Apply the > patches to your tree. Run them through the XenSource regression > testing. Complain if I broke something. It can't be much easier than > that for you. Well, maybe having a version of the patch that does not convert the code into the qemu identation would help a lot for on-list review. Also, would it be possible to just have the backend core and console+framebuffer patches alone? I don't see why we would need to change xen_machine_pv.c at all. That being said, I guess we should wait for a pull in the qemu-xen tree. Samuel