From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:39:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080826083941.GA27529@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C4D8BBAC.1C758%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:42:36PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 25/8/08 18:57, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>
> > Keir Fraser wrote:
> >> On 25/8/08 15:15, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> >>
> >> With regard to this Xenner patch series, I don't think we have a strong
> >> opinion. The changes are not particularly relevant to us. As long as the
> >> orthogonal qemu-on-xen modes that we *do* care about can coexist happily
> >> alongside, we'll be happy.
> >
> > Sorry, I was actually referring to the other qemu-dm PV domain support
> > patch series. That's the one that I'm looking for input from ya'll on.
> > Now that 3.3.0 has been released, it should be possible for you guys to
> > consider merging the patches into qemu-dm, right?
>
> We'll certainly be sync'ing with upstream qemu now, yes. I'm not sure what
> Ian Jackson's plans are with regard to Gerd's patches. I think he was hoping
> that Gerd would post patches to xen-devel against his tree (being an
> existing and actively maintained and tested Xen patchset) and then we would
> from there submit to upstream. Afaics there's some workflow or patchflow to
> be worked out here: I can't see why we would take Gerd's patches wholesale
> when we have a working patchset already.
The core benefit of this new patchset is increased featureset. The current
Xen fork of QEMU only works for running Xen VMs ontop of the Xen hypervisor,
when invoked by XenD. The new patchset should support this existing use
case, but in addition allow running of Xen VMs ontop of the Xen hypervisor,
*without* needing XenD, and also allow running of Xen VMs ontop of KVM
using Xenner. Supporting all three of those use cases with a codebase that
is in mainline QEMU would be a significant improvement over the existing
patchset both in terms of features & reduced support burden for people
developing and distributing Xen/QEMU.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 10:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] RfC: xenner (aka xen emulation) bits Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-22 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-22 13:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-22 15:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-25 12:58 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-25 14:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-25 15:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-08-25 17:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-08-25 18:42 ` Keir Fraser
2008-08-26 8:27 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-26 8:40 ` Keir Fraser
2008-08-26 8:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2008-08-22 10:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] xenner: use evtchn function pointers in the backends Gerd Hoffmann
[not found] ` <m2n.s.1KWU8S-002Pyj@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2008-08-26 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation Ian Jackson
2008-08-26 13:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2008-08-26 13:28 ` Ian Jackson
2008-08-26 19:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080826083941.GA27529@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).