From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQC6-00063E-LN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:08:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQC1-000625-J3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:08:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58106 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQC1-000622-Di for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:08:41 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]:45183) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZQC0-00051Z-TX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:08:41 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Looking for an SH4 QEMU-ready kernel Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:08:30 +0100 References: <20080828211732.GA8869@volta.aurel32.net> <200808292253.22150.paul@codesourcery.com> <1204341283.20080830122336@ena.si> In-Reply-To: <1204341283.20080830122336@ena.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808301408.31318.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Jernej =?iso-8859-2?q?Simon=E8i=E8?= On Saturday 30 August 2008, Jernej Simon=E8i=E8 wrote: > On Friday, August 29, 2008, 23:53:21, Paul Brook wrote: > > Linux usermode emulation assumes a linux host. In theory it's possible = to > > make it work elsewhere, but it's quite a lot of work, and you may end up > > having to reimplement a fair chunk of the linux kernel. > > Wasn't there a Wine-like project to run Linux applications on Windows > once? Yes. AFAIK it's been dead for years. I also did a proof-of-concept implementation using qemu usermode emulation = on=20 cygwin. It's a horrible hack though, and I'd be surprised if it worked for= =20 any nontrivial applications. Paul