From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KaErh-00048S-Oh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:15:05 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KaErf-00048G-DN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:15:04 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39221 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaErf-00048D-8S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:15:03 -0400
Received: from bsdimp.com ([199.45.160.85]:54776 helo=harmony.bsdimp.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <imp@bsdimp.com>) id 1KaEre-0004tc-P7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:15:03 -0400
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:13:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20080901.131350.-1622601764.imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] BSD user emulator
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580809011121m397096f1m7e8f29e67189a636@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5EF2D60B-861A-4306-A553-15626B92C463@suse.de>
	<20080901.115557.139568165.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<f43fc5580809011121m397096f1m7e8f29e67189a636@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: blauwirbel@gmail.com
Cc: agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

In message: <f43fc5580809011121m397096f1m7e8f29e67189a636@mail.gmail.com>
            "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@gmail.com> writes:
: diff -u nbsd-syscalls fbsd-syscalls |diffstat
:  fbsd-syscalls |  475 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
:  1 file changed, 237 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
: 
: diff -u obsd-syscalls fbsd-syscalls |diffstat
:  fbsd-syscalls |  298 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
:  1 file changed, 238 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
: 
: diff -u obsd-syscalls nbsd-syscalls |diffstat
:  nbsd-syscalls |  297 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
:  1 file changed, 238 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
: 
: Some are just renames, but those are still large numbers. I have to
: add syscall number conversion tables, I thought host SYS_xx were
: almost always equal to target SYS_xx.

These numbers seem high to me...  The generated files between the
different BSDs are somewhat different, so I'm not sure that these
simple tests will tell the whole story...

Warner