From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kavxt-0002eR-9x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:16:21 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Kavxq-0002dn-Rj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:16:19 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42093 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kavxq-0002dk-KC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:16:18 -0400
Received: from csl.cornell.edu ([128.84.224.10]:4340 helo=vlsi.csl.cornell.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <vince@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>) id 1Kavxp-0005Vr-9i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:16:18 -0400
Received: from stanley.csl.cornell.edu (stanley.csl.cornell.edu
	[128.84.224.15])
	by vlsi.csl.cornell.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m83HG8DH007477
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:16:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@csl.cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] checking if linux-user address is mapped (sparc)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580809030908n1414d8a9rcb4e5a037aecde9c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080903131412.N91699@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
References: <20080902165557.X88242@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
	<f43fc5580809030908n1414d8a9rcb4e5a037aecde9c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Could you test this patch?

The patch works great!  vpr works now, and it also fixes the parser 
benchmark.

Thanks for fixing this, I always get completely mixed up when digging 
through the memory access code trying to figure which parts apply to 
linux-user and which parts don't.

Of the 48 Spec2000 benchmarks, we are down to only 2 that don't work 
(facerec and sixtrack).  The remaining problem is floating point related, 
I'll see if I can track it down.

Thanks!

Vince