From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, apevec@redhat.com,
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix up pxe boot
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:27:00 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903192700.GA8000@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48BD59D7.7000702@qumranet.com>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:20:55PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target-i386/op_helper.c b/target-i386/op_helper.c
>>>> index 0b5fdc0..433aa3f 100644
>>>> --- a/target-i386/op_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/target-i386/op_helper.c
>>>> @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ do {\
>>>> #define PUSHL(ssp, sp, sp_mask, val)\
>>>> {\
>>>> sp -= 4;\
>>>> - stl_kernel((ssp) + (sp & (sp_mask)), (val));\
>>>> + stl_kernel((uint32_t)((ssp) + (sp & (sp_mask))), (uint32_t)(val));\
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Surly it is better to push this into the underlying virtual->physical
>>> translation functions, so it applies everywhere?
>>>
>>> btw, the cast is wrong for x86-64, so it must be qualified for 32-bit
>>> operating modes.
>>>
>> The tests were all done with x86_64. This is a PUSHL macro, so it's
>> 32-bit anyway.
>> A x86_64-only PUSHQ seems to do the right thing.
>>
>>
>
> Right.
>
> It's still odd to see this in an op helper rather than in somewhere generic.
After a second look, here's what it seems to me:
It's not in a generic place, such as ldl, because in general, we may want to grab
a 32-bit value from a 64-bit address. This is perfectly valid.
It's a specifity that the pop instruction, when not in long mode (manual says that in 64-bit mode
no 32-bit operand is valid, but then again, qemu should use the POPQ macro), that ssp:sp may overflow,
but we don't want it.
It would be possible to do something more generic if we had a segment_to_linear() function, that returned
the linear address, but we don't.
Does it make more sense to you?
>
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 21:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix up pxe boot Glauber Costa
2008-09-02 8:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-09-02 11:07 ` Glauber Costa
2008-09-02 15:20 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-02 15:22 ` Glauber Costa
2008-09-03 19:27 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2008-09-07 6:42 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-08 15:38 ` Glauber Costa
2008-09-09 14:17 ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:48 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080903192700.GA8000@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apevec@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).