From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kca2q-0004r7-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kca2o-0004pQ-Sv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:15 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55691 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kca2o-0004pD-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:14 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:19103) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kca2o-0003cF-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:16:14 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so347731nfb.12 for ; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:16:10 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] user emulation status? Message-ID: <20080908061609.GA1396@localhost.localdomain> References: <48C43986.3030903@wpkg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48C43986.3030903@wpkg.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 10:28:54PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Are you people interested in running processes in a foreign chroot (i.e.= =20 > ARM chroot on x86 PC)? Yes. I port ALT Linux to ARM using qemu-arm. > I wanted to set up some daily automated tests which would fetch current= =20 > SVN, build for ARM, MIPS, PPC and SPARC targets, try to install Debian=20 > with debootstrap in a chroot. >=20 >=20 > So far I see though, that only ARM would get "OK" result, MIPS would get= =20 > "partial"; PPC and SPARC would fail. >=20 > Does it make sense to trace it on a daily basis? Better weekly basis. linux-user emulation has no active maintainer, so I don't think that something change dramatically in one day. I have posted patches some week ago but have no answer. :( --=20 Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov + Belarus, Minsk + ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/ --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjEwykACgkQbWYnhzC5v6rb0wCeIsMqmatERwoS0VKxGhGxwu6t ORsAn11LtQNSTCxqCOE207g6dKBCCU7s =GWQp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--